Recent Comments

• 

  ontrackplant Website editor

  Posted: 20 September 2026, 08:33

  

  There certainly seems to be recent precedent for it - 73951 and 73952 were skipped.

  I don't think there are any new tampers on currently order so we won't find out for quite a while!

  DR73960 / reply

• 

  Bantam D14

  Posted: 20 September 2026, 07:36

  

  With the numbers 73961 to 73971 already taken for the class 73/9 locos, what will be the subsequent numbers for this type of plant, 73972 or does it matter if there is duplication on TOPS?

  DR73960 / reply

• 

  Neil D

  Posted: 15 September 2026, 21:39

  

  When seen on 13/09/26, this vehicle carried numbers RR301 & 99709 940711-3 but not it's correct number of 99709 911263-0 (at least not on the side I could see)

  ** Preserved Vehicles RR - 911263 RR301 / reply

• 

  Neil D

  Posted: 15 September 2026, 21:34

  

  When seen on 13/9/26, this vehicle carries both it's correct identity of 99709 940711-3 along with incorrect identity 99709 911263-0. The real 99709 911263-0 carries the number 99709 940711-3 & RR301 but does not carry 99709 911263-0 (at least not on the side I could see!)

  ** Preserved Vehicles RR - 940711 RRV126 / reply

• 

  Jonathan Gurd

  Posted: 14 September 2026, 18:30

  

  That was for its 12 monthly check, so should only be there for a few days if that

  Network Rail (Southern) RR - 976163 / reply

• View more recent comments...